Briefly: In our opinion, short (full) speculative positions in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward point of view.
In the past several days and weeks it was the mining stock sector that showed exceptional strength and rallied more than the underlying metals. However, this wasn’t the case yesterday – is this a major sell signal?
Possibly, however, we still can’t rule out another small move higher as gold hasn’t rallied to the combination of its resistance lines just yet. Let’s take a closer look at what happened in the precious metals world (charts courtesy of http://stockcharts.com).
From the long-term perspective, nothing changed in gold (or silver) - we once again see no major changes in the past few days and our previous comments remain up-to-date:
We see that gold approached the declining resistance line and that’s one important factor that alone could suggest opening short positions, not long ones. This line stopped the rally in late 2015 and it’s currently created by 3 major tops: the late 2012 top, early 2015 top and late 2015 top and this makes it a strong resistance.
Back in late 2015 gold moved a bit above this line, so we can’t rule out a move above it this time either, but it’s unlikely that this move would be significant. Gold has moved to this line if we base it on the weekly closing prices. If highs are considered, then this line is at about $1,134 (since the line is declining, this level is now lower).
Gold moved more or less to the 200-day moving average and the 2014 high yesterday. It could be the case that gold is already reversing, but it could also be the case that it will move a bit higher (to $1,134 or so) before declining. All in all, our previous comments remain up-to-date:
The $1,134 level is also where we have the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level and it’s very close to the 200-day moving average. This levels serves as a strong resistance and it’s quite likely that gold will reverse right after moving to this level or very close to it (in fact, gold is already relatively close to it and it could turn around shortly).
Not much changed in silver (and the outlook remains bearish), so let’s move to mining stocks:
In yesterday’s alert, we wrote the following:
The volume seen in mining stocks wasn’t huge either. Comparing it to what we saw in the recent days makes yesterday’s volume appear rather small. It’s not tiny enough to be a screaming sell signal, but it’s low enough to make us doubt the validity of the breakout above the declining resistance line. This is especially that case since the GDX ETF moved right to the 50% Fibonacci retracement level and the HUI Index at the same time moved to its 61.8% Fibonacci retracement. Combining the above with generally bearish implications of the silver chart and very strong resistance in gold very close to the current price makes us think that the breakout will be invalidated sooner rather than later.
Miners declined yesterday and the volume that accompanied this move was higher than what we had seen previously, so the implications are bearish. More importantly, the breakout above the declining resistance line was just invalidated – the implications are bearish as well.
Summing up, we saw a few new bearish signs yesterday which didn’t change much as the outlook had already been bearish. It seems that the decline in the precious metals sector will resume sooner rather than later and the short positions appear to be justified from the risk to reward point of view.
As always, we will keep you – our subscribers – updated.
To summarize:
Trading capital (our opinion): Short positions (full) in gold, silver and mining stocks are justified from the risk/reward perspective with the following stop-loss orders and initial target price levels:
- Gold: initial target price: $973; stop-loss: $1,143, initial target price for the DGLD ETN: $117.70; stop-loss for the DGLD ETN $74.28
- Silver: initial target price: $12.13; stop-loss: $14.83, initial target price for the DSLV ETN: $101.84; stop-loss for DSLV ETN $57.49
- Mining stocks (price levels for the GDX ETF): initial target price: $10.23; stop-loss: $15.47, initial target price for the DUST ETF: $31.90; stop-loss for the DUST ETF $10.61
In case one wants to bet on junior mining stocks' prices (we do not suggest doing so – we think senior mining stocks are more predictable in the case of short-term trades – if one wants to do it anyway, we provide the details), here are the stop-loss details and initial target prices:
- GDXJ ETF: initial target price: $15.23; stop-loss: $21.13
- JDST ETF: initial target price: $52.99; stop-loss: $21.59
Long-term capital (our opinion): No positions
Insurance capital (our opinion): Full position
Plus, you might want to read why our stop-loss orders are usually relatively far from the current price.
Please note that a full position doesn’t mean using all of the capital for a given trade. You will find details on our thoughts on gold portfolio structuring in the Key Insights section on our website.
As a reminder – “initial target price” means exactly that – an “initial” one, it’s not a price level at which we suggest closing positions. If this becomes the case (like it did in the previous trade) we will refer to these levels as levels of exit orders (exactly as we’ve done previously). Stop-loss levels, however, are naturally not “initial”, but something that, in our opinion, might be entered as an order.
Since it is impossible to synchronize target prices and stop-loss levels for all the ETFs and ETNs with the main markets that we provide these levels for (gold, silver and mining stocks – the GDX ETF), the stop-loss levels and target prices for other ETNs and ETF (among other: UGLD, DGLD, USLV, DSLV, NUGT, DUST, JNUG, JDST) are provided as supplementary, and not as “final”. This means that if a stop-loss or a target level is reached for any of the “additional instruments” (DGLD for instance), but not for the “main instrument” (gold in this case), we will view positions in both gold and DGLD as still open and the stop-loss for DGLD would have to be moved lower. On the other hand, if gold moves to a stop-loss level but DGLD doesn’t, then we will view both positions (in gold and DGLD) as closed. In other words, since it’s not possible to be 100% certain that each related instrument moves to a given level when the underlying instrument does, we can’t provide levels that would be binding. The levels that we do provide are our best estimate of the levels that will correspond to the levels in the underlying assets, but it will be the underlying assets that one will need to focus on regarding the sings pointing to closing a given position or keeping it open. We might adjust the levels in the “additional instruments” without adjusting the levels in the “main instruments”, which will simply mean that we have improved our estimation of these levels, not that we changed our outlook on the markets. We are already working on a tool that would update these levels on a daily basis for the most popular ETFs, ETNs and individual mining stocks.
Our preferred ways to invest in and to trade gold along with the reasoning can be found in the how to buy gold section. Additionally, our preferred ETFs and ETNs can be found in our Gold & Silver ETF Ranking.
As always, we'll keep you - our subscribers - updated should our views on the market change. We will continue to send out Gold & Silver Trading Alerts on each trading day and we will send additional Alerts whenever appropriate.
The trading position presented above is the netted version of positions based on subjective signals (opinion) from your Editor, and the Tools and Indicators.
As a reminder, Gold & Silver Trading Alerts are posted before or on each trading day (we usually post them before the opening bell, but we don't promise doing that each day). If there's anything urgent, we will send you an additional small alert before posting the main one.
=====
Latest Free Trading Alerts:
The last Bank of Japan’s move is an excellent opportunity to discuss the impact of NIRP on the gold market. How will it affect the global economy and the price of gold?
=====
Hand-picked precious-metals-related links:
Gold to Fall 5% in 2016, Silver -6%: LBMA Experts
Gold Resilient as This Year's Best Commodity as Stocks, Oil Wilt
=====
In other news:
The Fed Wants to Test How Banks Would Handle Negative Rates
Goldman Sachs Says It May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How Capitalism Is Working
Bank of Japan Governor Kuroda says can ease more, devise new tools
Bank Bear Market Gets Worse as Goldman, Citi Sell Off Again
It's the 1980s Again, Thanks to the Oil Glut
Oil rises after Russia says open to OPEC meeting
=====
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA
Founder, Editor-in-chief
Gold & Silver Trading Alerts
Forex Trading Alerts
Oil Investment Updates
Oil Trading Alerts
